Institutional Transition as an Administrative Reform Challenge: Knowledge Discontinuity in Indonesia's Population Bureaucracy
PDF

Keywords

bureaucratic reform
institutional transition
knowledge discontinuity
organisational memory
administrative capacity

How to Cite

Institutional Transition as an Administrative Reform Challenge: Knowledge Discontinuity in Indonesia’s Population Bureaucracy. (2026). Proceedings of the Bali Sruti Conference, 1(1), 432-438. https://doi.org/10.68290/bgsf.v1i1.47

Abstract

This study examines institutional transition as an administrative reform challenge, focusing on how Indonesia’s population-bureaucracy reorganisation from BKKBN to the Ministry of Population and Family Development (Kemendukbangga) generates knowledge discontinuity. A qualitative descriptive-analytic case study was conducted at the Kemendukbangga/BKKBN Provincial Representative of Bengkulu. Data came from semi-structured interviews with three purposively selected key informants, direct observation of three organisational units, and analysis of strategic, performance, and data-management documents. The data were triangulated and thematically coded using NVivo. Authority restructuring, revised coordination lines, and new data-management protocols compress staff adaptation time while existing workflows must continue. Staff rotation intensifies this disruption because tacit procedural knowledge is lost where formal handover and knowledge-retention systems are absent. The single-case design, three leadership-level informants, and ongoing institutional transition limit broader generalisation. The study positions transition management as a distinct dimension of administrative capacity relevant to sub-national bureaucracies undergoing reorganisation. It integrates organisational memory theory with Indonesia’s population-bureaucracy transition to explain how reform processes can produce knowledge loss.

PDF

References

Andrayani, L., & Kurniawan, D. (2023). The influence of mutation, compensation, and promotion on the motivation of employees in the Ministry of Finance Jakarta with turnover intention as a mediation variable. Greenation International Journal of Tourism and Management, 1(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.38035/GIJTM.V1I3.36

Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional [BKKBN]. (2024). Laporan kinerja Perwakilan BKKBN Provinsi Bengkulu tahun 2024. BKKBN.

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

de Holan, P. M., & Phillips, N. (2004). Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Science, 50(11), 1603–1613. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0273

Honadle, B. W. (1981). A capacity-building framework: A search for concept and purpose. Public Administration Review, 41(5), 575–580. https://doi.org/10.2307/976270

Karningsih, K., & Wibowo, A. S. (2024). Bureaucratic reform and the enhancement of civil service performance: A literature review on the merit system policy in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 1(2), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v1i2.479

Kuybida, V., & Shpektorenko, I. (2023). Staff rotation: Resources of the institutional channel of personnel professionalization and the instrument (procedure) of public service personnel management. Public Administration and Regional Development, (21), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2023.21.11

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Rahmat, B., Hartanto, B., & Hilman, A. (2024). Bureaucratic reform in Indonesia: From "public administration" to "public management". Journal of Local Government Issues, 7(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v7i2.33848

Rao, R. D., & Argote, L. (2006). Organizational learning and forgetting: The effects of turnover and structure. European Management Review, 3(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500057

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1740676

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278992

Wettenhall, R. (2011). Organisational amnesia: A serious public sector reform issue. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551111099200

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zakaria, H. B., Bukari, S., & Kendie, S. B. (2015). Where is the organisational memory? A tale of local government employees in Ghana. Public Organization Review, 15(4), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-014-0271-1