Keywords
community-based programme
family welfare policy
information governance
local institutions
How to Cite
Abstract
This study evaluates the implementation of a national community-based family welfare programme at an urban village that remained at foundational classification more than two years after its launch, and identifies why field activity did not translate into recorded achievement. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted in Kandang Limun urban village, Bengkulu City. Data came from semi-structured interviews with eight informants, field observation, and document analysis. Content analysis followed five implementation dimensions: objective clarity, resource adequacy, communication and coordination, implementer capacity and commitment, and external environmental support. Barriers appear across all five dimensions and interlock as three patterns: failed policy transmission to implementers, invisibility of activity caused by information system governance failure, and an institutional leadership vacuum at village level. Community receptiveness is strong while structural support from above is largely absent. A single locus limits direct generalisation to other programme sites. The study offers a diagnosis distinguishing recording failure from programme failure. It introduces information system governance as a critical variable within an established implementation evaluation framework.
References
Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional Provinsi Bengkulu. (2025). Laporan tim kerja pengendalian penduduk per November 2025. BKKBN Provinsi Bengkulu.
Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional. (2020). Rencana strategis BKKBN 2020-2024. BKKBN.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Indonesia 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices (2nd ed.). University of South Florida.
Dunn, W. N. (2016). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach (5th ed.). Routledge.
Gemiharto, I., & Rulandari, N. (2024). Challenges of population services through population administration information systems in Jakarta buffering area. Politeia: Journal of Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations, 1, 12-24.
Kusuma, D. S. (2022). Buku ajar kebijakan publik: Proses, implementasi dan evaluasi. Penerbit Samudra Biru.
Latifa, I., Susanto, A., Rahmadhani, I., & Puspita, D. (2023). Makna-makna simbolik dalam pengasuhan anak. Jurnal Komunikasi, 12(2), 123-137.
Meutia, I. F. (2017). Analisis kebijakan publik. CV Anugrah Utama Raharja.
Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (2015). Handbook of practical program evaluation (4th ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
Nurbalqis, A., Poti, J., & Subiyakto, R. (2023). Evaluasi pelaksanaan program Kampung Keluarga Berkualitas di Desa Busung Kecamatan Seri Kuala Lobam Kabupaten Bintan. Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 1(3), 45-60.
Peraturan Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang penyelenggaraan Kampung Keluarga Berkualitas. (2023).
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 62 Tahun 2010 tentang Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional. (2010).
Rahman, A. N., & Winarni, F. (2023). Efektivitas program Kampung KB sebagai upaya peningkatan kualitas hidup masyarakat. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 14(1), 78-90.
Sa’adah, N. T., & Sukmana, H. (2025). Evaluasi program Kampung Keluarga Berkualitas di Desa Tambak Kalisogo Kecamatan Jabon Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Journal Dinamika Pemerintahan, 8, 114-142.
Undang-Undang Nomor 52 Tahun 2009 tentang Perkembangan Kependudukan dan Pembangunan Keluarga. (2009).
Yasmin, S. (2025). Population growth and structural poverty in Indonesia: A policy review. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan, 20(1), 55-70.